| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jon Lapham <lapham(at)extracta(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with a rule on upgrade to v7.1.1 |
| Date: | 2001-05-11 13:20:12 |
| Message-ID: | 3800.989587212@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jon Lapham <lapham(at)extracta(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> I didn't do Pgv7.0.3 b/c I think it may be unnecessary
> since 7.1RC1 doesn't show this problem, while 7.1.1 does. But, if you
> really think it necessary, I will repeat his using 7.0.3.
No, that seems like useless work.
> 1) As usual, the 7.1RC1 returns from the "UPDATE ... " command as fast
> as I press enter. The 7.1.1 returns from the "UPDATE ... " command in
> about 10 minutes.
> 2) The two explains are identical.
Oh, *that's* interesting.
> 5) There are 8664 and 3680 tuples in the "tplantorgan" and "tplant" tables
> respectively. So this is a relatively small DB.
Would you be willing to send me a dump of the whole DB (or at least the
tables needed for this query)?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-11 13:37:00 | Re: REL7_1_STABLE tag/branch |
| Previous Message | bpalmer | 2001-05-11 13:17:56 | Re: Re: Regression tests for OBSD scrammed.. |