Re: CommitFest 2009-09: Now In Progress

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2009-09: Now In Progress
Date: 2009-09-15 13:54:51
Message-ID: 37ed240d0909150654i4929d7ebs10ae24cf52c129e9@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/9/15 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> I believe the terminology we've been using, at least for the past year
> since I've been involved, is as follows:
>
> Open = open to new patches
> In Progress = working on reviewing and committing patches, no longer
> open to new patches
> Closed = all patches have been dealt with
>
> So, no, 2009-09 was open yesterday.  Now it's in progress, and 2009-11 is open.

Yeah, that's what we've been using to date, but I do agree with Stefan
that it's a bit confusing. I think part of the problem is that "open"
and "closed" are normally opposites, but in our case they are talking
about different things.

Perhaps we should move to something like:

Accepting contributions => Under review => Complete.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-15 14:05:23 Re: [BUGS] BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2009-09-15 13:54:18 Re: [BUGS] BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak