From: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2009-09: Now In Progress |
Date: | 2009-09-15 13:54:51 |
Message-ID: | 37ed240d0909150654i4929d7ebs10ae24cf52c129e9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/9/15 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> I believe the terminology we've been using, at least for the past year
> since I've been involved, is as follows:
>
> Open = open to new patches
> In Progress = working on reviewing and committing patches, no longer
> open to new patches
> Closed = all patches have been dealt with
>
> So, no, 2009-09 was open yesterday. Now it's in progress, and 2009-11 is open.
Yeah, that's what we've been using to date, but I do agree with Stefan
that it's a bit confusing. I think part of the problem is that "open"
and "closed" are normally opposites, but in our case they are talking
about different things.
Perhaps we should move to something like:
Accepting contributions => Under review => Complete.
Cheers,
BJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-15 14:05:23 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-09-15 13:54:18 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #5053: domain constraints still leak |