Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format
Date: 2009-08-10 17:56:08
Message-ID: 37ed240d0908101056k721dd2b2n64c31133a564ff05@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/8/11 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Working through this now, and I noticed that the example added to the
> manual seems to be wrong:
>
>        <entry><literal>to_char(0.000485, '9.99EEEE')</literal></entry>
>        <entry><literal>' 4.850e-04'</literal></entry>
>
> With 9.99 as the pattern, I'd expect (and indeed I get) 4.85e-04
> not 4.850e-04.  This is correct behavior, no?

Correct. I apologise for the oversight.

The example output should lose the trailing zero, or else the example
query needs an extra '9' after the decimal point. I don't think it
makes much difference which.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2009-08-10 18:10:24 Re: BUG #4961: pg_standby.exe crashes with no args
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2009-08-10 17:55:44 Re: mixed, named notation support