Re: Colons in wiki page titles, and commit fest page names

From: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Colons in wiki page titles, and commit fest page names
Date: 2008-09-09 15:48:42
Message-ID: 37ed240d0809090848q33f419fbgded97b925c96c67f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Brendan Jurd wrote:
>> So, what naming scheme should we go with? I guess I would lean
>> towards "CommitFest YYYY-MM" for easy lexical sorting.
>
> I think the year/month naming idea is fine, at least for as far ahead
> as we can see at the moment. There's no intention of allowing the
> commit fests to slip.
>

The YYYY-MM naming convention seems to have been a success, so while I
was doing some cleanup on the wiki this evening I decided to go ahead
and rename the CommitFest pages by changing the colons to spaces. For
example,

CommitFest:2008-09 => CommitFest 2008-09

In each case, there is a redirect page left behind for those who have
static bookmarks to particular commitfests.

Meanwhile, I've manually resolved double-redirects like the old
CommitFest:{March,May,July} pages and updated all the pages which
reference the commitfest pages directly.

Apart from the orphaned redirects, I don't think we have any pages
left with "CommitFest:" in the name.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-09-09 15:49:03 Re: Wiki CSS
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-09-09 15:43:28 Re: Wiki CSS