From: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] quote_literal with NULL |
Date: | 2007-10-11 16:11:28 |
Message-ID: | 37ed240d0710110911x5e4cf8afp4c4921d291e73966@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Hi patchers,
Per discussion on -hackers, I've implemented a new internal function
quote_nullable, as an alternative to quote_literal. The difference is
that quote_nullable returns the text value 'NULL' on NULL input, which
is suitable for insertion into an SQL statement.
The idea is that when you're writing a plpgsql function with dynamic
queries, you can use quote_nullable for values which are
possibly-null. You're still responsible for handling NULLs sensibly
within your query, but at least you get a syntactically valid SQL
statement.
I've included doc updates but no new regression tests. I did not add
tests because there are currently no tests for quote_literal and when
I recently suggested addition of tests for quote_ident [1] they were
rejected. I still don't fully understand the criteria for inclusion
of regression tests, but this is a similar situation, so I'm following
the same guidance.
Patch compiles cleanly and passes make check on x86 gentoo.
Thanks for your time,
BJ
[1] http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-10/msg00080.php
On 10/11/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Well, it's clearly useful in INSERT and UPDATE. For WHERE cases, you
> might or might not be able to use it, but I note that quote_nullable()
> would work much more like what happens if you use a parameter symbol
> and then bind NULL as the actual parameter value ...
>
> In hindsight we should probably have done quote_literal the way the OP
> suggests, but I concur that it's too late to change it. An additional
> function seems a reasonable compromise.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
quote-nullable_0.diff | text/plain | 6.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-11 16:46:12 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Previous Message | Alexey Klyukin | 2007-10-11 16:10:18 | Re: Some questions about mammoth replication |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-11 18:20:26 | Re: Packed varlena tuptoaster.c oops |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-10-11 14:51:22 | Packed varlena tuptoaster.c oops |