From: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Add function for quote_qualified_identifier? |
Date: | 2007-09-22 22:11:08 |
Message-ID: | 37ed240d0709221511x44237f64n7d417b4d06579620@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 9/23/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> This seems rather pointless, since it's equivalent to
> quote_ident(schemaname) || '.' || quote_ident(relname).
Yes it is, and I brought that up in the OP:
I wrote:
> Clearly a DBA could just create this function himself in SQL (and it
> wouldn't be difficult), but is that a good reason not to have it in
> our standard set of functions?
But since nobody arced up about it I thought I might as well move
things along and produce a patch.
Many of the functions provided by postgres are easy to write yourself.
That doesn't mean they shouldn't be there. After all, there is
*exactly* one way to do quote_qualified_ident. Why require every DBA
who needs this functionality to go through the motions?
I'll admit that it's a minor improvement, but that seems reasonable
given it has a miniscule cost.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-22 23:45:24 | Re: Text <-> C string |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-09-22 21:55:59 | Re: Text <-> C string |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-22 23:45:24 | Re: Text <-> C string |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-09-22 21:55:59 | Re: Text <-> C string |