Re: change name of redirect_stderr?

From: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Michael Glaesemann" <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: change name of redirect_stderr?
Date: 2007-08-14 20:11:46
Message-ID: 37ed240d0708141311m3085ec6dn5f9ca420172069af@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/15/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> For example, "log_line_prefix" is misnamed under this rule, and ought to
> be "logging_line_prefix". Similarly, redirect_stderr would become
> "logging_something" --- I'd prefer "logging_start_collector" but could
> live with "logging_collector" (or maybe "logging_use_collector"?)
>

The consistent prefix idea sounds good; does "logging_enable" jive
with your proposal?

Introduction of the term "collector" might be an overthink, and could
confuse people. Your average postgres user tweaking his config file
is going to see that and wonder what on earth a "log collector" is.

Whereas it's generally understood that to "log" is to capture output
and make it persistent, and "logging_enable" is clearly a setting that
allows this to take place.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-14 20:29:26 Re: tsearch2 in PostgreSQL 8.3?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-08-14 20:09:37 Re: change name of redirect_stderr?