From: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Michael Glaesemann" <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: change name of redirect_stderr? |
Date: | 2007-08-14 20:11:46 |
Message-ID: | 37ed240d0708141311m3085ec6dn5f9ca420172069af@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 8/15/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> For example, "log_line_prefix" is misnamed under this rule, and ought to
> be "logging_line_prefix". Similarly, redirect_stderr would become
> "logging_something" --- I'd prefer "logging_start_collector" but could
> live with "logging_collector" (or maybe "logging_use_collector"?)
>
The consistent prefix idea sounds good; does "logging_enable" jive
with your proposal?
Introduction of the term "collector" might be an overthink, and could
confuse people. Your average postgres user tweaking his config file
is going to see that and wonder what on earth a "log collector" is.
Whereas it's generally understood that to "log" is to capture output
and make it persistent, and "logging_enable" is clearly a setting that
allows this to take place.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-14 20:29:26 | Re: tsearch2 in PostgreSQL 8.3? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-08-14 20:09:37 | Re: change name of redirect_stderr? |