Re: timestamp default values

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp default values
Date: 2005-08-07 04:41:22
Message-ID: 37ed240d0508062141264379d5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> I'd be interested to see how you do that, considering that abstime
> can't store fractional seconds. timenow() is even more obsolete than
> timeofday() --- AFAICS it's not documented at all, anywhere. The whole
> abstime datatype is obsolete, actually, and will have to go away
> sometime before 2038.
>

If the current implementation of timenow() is truly obsolete, would it
be verboten to change its return type? We could rewrite the function
to return timestamp, for example.

--
BJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-07 04:47:19 Re: timestamp default values
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-07 04:26:00 Re: timestamp default values