Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

From: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Date: 2024-11-20 06:19:58
Message-ID: 37bf870a-22e0-4aba-b845-549482118f8d@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 18/11/2024 06:19, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 3:27 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here is the next revision of this patch. No material changes,
> adjustments for comments and commit message.
I have passed through the code and found no issues. Maybe only phrase:
"eval_const_expressions() will be simplified if there is more than one."
which is used in both patches: here, the 'will' may be removed, as for me.

Also, I re-read the thread, and as AFAICS, no other issues remain. So, I
think it would be OK to move the status of this feature to 'ready for
committer'.

--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-11-20 06:22:11 Re: PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2024-11-20 05:41:16 Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0