Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing
Date: 1999-09-23 05:38:55
Message-ID: 37E9BCEF.57C8F6A8@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Not sure why -j2 is not faster than normal -j...

I was just looking at this a little while ago at work. It is not
faster because gmake does not propagate the "-j2" flag to submakes, on
the (correct) theory that you might get a geometrically growing system
load, rather than just keeping two makes running through all the
subdirectories.

This is the behavior of "-j", unless you specify it without a numeric
parameter, in which case it *does* allow parallel submakes.

The first time I tried "-j", I did it without reading the man pages
and without specifying a numeric parameter. It did a magnificent job
of bringing down my system trying to build ACE/TAO, a *large* Corba
package. Chewed up all of real memory, then all of swap; not sure if I
ran out of process slots or memory first but it wasn't pretty. It was
*very* fast though :)

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Haberlach 1999-09-23 05:45:55
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-23 03:01:10 Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing