Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2]

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2]
Date: 1999-09-21 15:21:31
Message-ID: 37E7A27B.6BF226AD@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

> > Or have the createdb command run 'man createdb' *grin*
> I was thinking:
> See the CREATE DATABASE command for more options.

I can't help thinking that this thread is trying to solve a problem
that isn't a problem. createdb works fine. You can do more from within
sql. So what? Someone could, if they thought it was a problem, add
more capabilities to createdb, and an admin could choose to use it or
not.

Seems to me that it works just fine for most cases right now; sure
does for me...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 1999-09-21 16:05:51 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-21 14:52:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2]

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-09-21 15:27:55 Re: [HACKERS] postmaster disappears
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-09-21 15:15:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Referential Integrity In PostgreSQL