Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why do shmem attach?
Date: 1999-09-20 05:33:39
Message-ID: 37E5C733.ABE1902D@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Or shmem inheritance is not portable?
>
> If it works on your machine with it removed, commit the change and I can
> test it here. I don't know of any portability problems with shared
> memory children.

I wrote simple test program and it works under FreeBSD and Solaris
(on Ultra). Currently I'm not able to do more. Actually, I worry
does this work under MS Windows.

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Samersoff 1999-09-20 05:53:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-20 04:06:36 Re: [HACKERS] All things equal, we are still alot slower then MySQL?