Re: Postgres Benchmark Results

From: Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
Date: 2007-05-21 23:44:57
Message-ID: 37E3AB9B-77D7-4757-A379-29BE25F63533@event-s.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Am 21.05.2007 um 15:01 schrieb Jim C. Nasby:

> I'd be willing to bet money that the drive is lying about commits/
> fsync.
> Each transaction committed essentially requires one revolution of the
> drive with pg_xlog on it, so a 15kRPM drive limits you to 250TPS.

Yes, that right, but if a lot of the transactions are selects, there
is no entry in the x_log for them and most of the stuff can come from
the cache - read from memory which is blazing fast compared to any
disk ... And this was a pg_bench test - I don't know what the
benchmark really does but if I remember correctly it is mostly reading.

cug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich 2007-05-22 00:05:20 Re: Postgres Benchmark Results
Previous Message PFC 2007-05-21 21:39:39 Re: Postgres Benchmark Results