Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes

From: Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Status report: long-query-string changes
Date: 1999-09-13 14:33:27
Message-ID: 37DD0B37.E8F8F931@udmnet.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > The solution is obvious - to eliminate exclusive states entirely!
> > Banzai!!!
>
> That will complicate the lexer, and make it more brittle and difficult
> to read, since you will have to, essentially, implement the exclusive
> states using flags within each element.
>
> If you want to try it as an exercise, we *might* find it isn't as ugly
> as I am afraid it will be, but...
>

Gimme the latest lexer source. (I pay for my Internet on a per
minute basis, so I can't connect to CVS) You will see what I mean.

--
Leon.
-------
He knows he'll never have to answer for any of his theories actually
being put to test. If they were, they would be contaminated by reality.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-13 14:36:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgaccess update for 6.5.2?
Previous Message John Henry 1999-09-13 14:10:37 - WANTED