Re: [HACKERS] md.c is feeling much better now, thank you

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] md.c is feeling much better now, thank you
Date: 1999-09-02 15:32:59
Message-ID: 37CE98AB.ADF225E3@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> My guess is that we ought to be checking for relcache invalidation
> immediately after gaining any lock on the relation. I don't know where
> that should be done, however.

Seems as GOOD solution!
We could do inval check in LockRelation() just after LockAcquire().

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-09-02 15:33:36 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum analyze
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-09-02 15:22:49 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer