| From: | Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hiroki Kataoka <kataoka(at)interwiz(dot)koganei(dot)tokyo(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] RE: PgAccess 0.97 - final preview |
| Date: | 1999-08-12 06:30:33 |
| Message-ID: | 37B26A09.64A57D9B@flex.ro |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Hiroki Kataoka wrote:
>
> I think that better solution is to separate a source file of pgaccess to
> main code and message catalog files. And message catalog files should be
> supplied for each of all supported languages. The pgaccess main code
> includes only english messages as default language, and supports to load one
> message catalogue file at startup.
That's exactly what I intend to do in the next version.
But in order to grab together more translations and for the easy of use
I choose to keep for the moment the Messages array in the main file.
There will be separate *.lang files that will be used for different
languages. Also , PgAccess will be sliced into separate files for each
module.
But related to japanese messages I have a question. If I will move the
definition for Messages in a separate file, why would it help it? What
"japanese Tcl" are you talking?
Have you tried Tcl/Tk 8.1 or 8.2 beta? They (scriptics) are saying that
it support Unicode. Maybe that's what you should use.
--
Constantin Teodorescu
FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gene Sokolov | 1999-08-12 07:01:30 | ODBC (6.40.0006): SQL_TIME binary format (bug? feature?) |
| Previous Message | mmw | 1999-08-12 04:44:41 | Access ODBC worries |