Re: [HACKERS] WAL: parallel logging

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Brian Bruns <camber(at)umcc(dot)ais(dot)org>, Stan Brown <stanb(at)awod(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL: parallel logging
Date: 1999-08-10 10:40:59
Message-ID: 37B001BB.1ED5A89C@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner wrote:
>
> Did you ever make a decision about parrallel logging etc?

Yes. I decided to make first implementation without parallel
logging and run tests to see how many log spinlock contentions
will be there.
I finally found parallel logging in Oracle - he uses it
with parallel server option (for clusters).

I already began codding and hope to have something in
~ 3 weeks...

Thanks to all!

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 1999-08-10 11:31:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages
Previous Message José Soares 1999-08-10 08:05:13 another DECIMAL problem