From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, webmaster(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Postgres Core List <pgsql-core(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] Re: [Keystone Slip # 22] Some confusion with datetimedata type andtimezone |
Date: | 1999-07-27 16:52:55 |
Message-ID: | 379DE3E7.F8F2B951@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I have no problems with this...I heard an outcry for a bug-tracking
> > system, and this was the better known one, so installed it. If ya wanna
> > trash it, be my guest...I have no attachments to it :)
> If you're gonna trash it, let me know slightly in advance so I can remove
> the announcement and news entry (it's only a couple of mouse clicks).
We are not going to trash it, but we *must* evolve how it will be
used. (btw, I've taken this on-list per Tom Lane's suggestion; the
short summary is that the new bug tracking system is getting non-bug
bug reports and it is short-circuiting the highly successful mailing
list support process.)
Can you change the announcement to state something like:
We have installed a new bug tracking system. After reading
documentation, checking the tracking system, *and* asking for help on
the mailing lists, you may be directed to enter your problem statement
into the system. Please do *not* enter a new report unless it is a
confirmed bug or problem.
This wording should get us some breathing room. Comments?
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-07-27 17:05:28 | Re: dynloader and PLs [was: plperl intial pass] |
Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-07-27 16:12:05 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] i386 RPMs available for v6.5.1 |