Re: [HACKERS] SSL patch

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee>
To: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SSL patch
Date: 1999-07-26 10:15:55
Message-ID: 379C355B.DA4DDF7F@trust.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Ansley, Michael" wrote:
>
> Hannu wrote:
> >> Actually you are free to use HTTPS on 80 and HTTP on 443 if you wish.
> >>
> I understand this; the point that I was trying to make was that they run on
> different ports. I don't think that it's possible to run both http and
> https on the same port at the same time on the same server, and I think that
> we should take the cue.

It is possible unless you mean that the very same connection is both
http and https ;)

The decision to use either http or https is done et _each_ connection
setup (at each http(s) request).
So http://samehost.com:443/ and https://samehost.com/ will connect to
samehost.com port 443, only the latter user SSL.

>
> It's a concept that people already understand.

Agreed, but there is nothing at the protocol level that forces them to
be
separate.

-------------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-07-26 10:18:06 Re: [HACKERS] plperl intial pass
Previous Message Ansley, Michael 1999-07-26 09:52:44 RE: [HACKERS] SSL patch