Re: [rfc,patch] PL/Proxy in core

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [rfc,patch] PL/Proxy in core
Date: 2008-05-15 13:55:50
Message-ID: 3792.1210859750@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> How about following patch? I have bison 2.3 and it seems not to do
> global allocation, so it should be fine. There may be early exit
> with elog(ERRROR) inside so I'd like to avoid malloc() itself.

None of our other parsers fool with bison's memory allocation;
why does yours need to?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-05-15 14:12:52 Re: SSL and USER_CERT_FILE
Previous Message pgsql 2008-05-15 13:53:13 Re: SSL and USER_CERT_FILE