From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Postgres Documentation List <docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages |
Date: | 1999-07-17 20:54:25 |
Message-ID: | 3790ED81.B9F38C0D@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
> OK, let me get this straight: man pages will no longer be in the CVS
> tree because they will no longer be original files, but they will be
> part of the standard distribution as derived files, right?
Yes. Well, at least, maybe, sort of...
As is the case with the other (html) docs, I'm planning on putting a
man tarball into the distribution. Up to now, the easiest way to do
that is to put the tarball into cvs, but I'm open to other
suggestions.
Do I guess correctly that we currently generate our production
releases by actually doing a cvs checkout and then a "mini-build" of
the system to generate the yacc/bison derived files? If so, we could
consider doing the same sort of thing for the html and man products,
but it (probably) makes this packaging process more fragile.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-17 21:47:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages |
Previous Message | Simeó | 1999-07-17 18:07:24 | Re: [GENERAL] Foreign Keys in PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-07-17 21:03:46 | Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-17 19:13:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: include-file cleanup |