Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgres Documentation List <docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages
Date: 1999-07-17 20:54:25
Message-ID: 3790ED81.B9F38C0D@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

> OK, let me get this straight: man pages will no longer be in the CVS
> tree because they will no longer be original files, but they will be
> part of the standard distribution as derived files, right?

Yes. Well, at least, maybe, sort of...

As is the case with the other (html) docs, I'm planning on putting a
man tarball into the distribution. Up to now, the easiest way to do
that is to put the tarball into cvs, but I'm open to other
suggestions.

Do I guess correctly that we currently generate our production
releases by actually doing a cvs checkout and then a "mini-build" of
the system to generate the yacc/bison derived files? If so, we could
consider doing the same sort of thing for the html and man products,
but it (probably) makes this packaging process more fragile.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-07-17 21:47:21 Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages
Previous Message Simeó 1999-07-17 18:07:24 Re: [GENERAL] Foreign Keys in PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-17 21:03:46 Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-17 19:13:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: include-file cleanup