Re: Overgenerous parsing of UPDATE targetlist

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Overgenerous parsing of UPDATE targetlist
Date: 1999-07-14 15:20:39
Message-ID: 378CAAC7.5BDE0C70@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I propose renaming res_target_list and res_target_el to
> update_target_list and update_target_el, and removing the alternatives
> that aren't actually valid for UPDATE.
> Having done that, we might as well rename res_target_list2 and
> res_target_el2 to something clearer (I'm thinking just target_list and
> target_el, but if you want to keep the "res_" I won't object).

Sounds good. I never poked very far into the usage of these clauses,
but istm that your suggestions would make things clearer.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-14 15:32:36 Re: Arrays versus 'type constant' syntax
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-14 15:18:29 Re: 6.5.1 release