Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribi:
>> I don't think that testing rowMarks is the right thing at all here.
>> That tells you whether it's a SELECT FOR UPDATE, but actually we
>> want any cursor (and only cursors) to have a private snapshot.
> The attached patch implements this. I intend to apply to 8.4 and HEAD
> shortly.
Looks sane. Can we add a short regression test sequence that checks
for this?
regards, tom lane