From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size |
Date: | 1999-07-08 11:16:51 |
Message-ID: | 378488A3.76A05334@krs.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> What about adding one more ItemPointerData to the tuple
> header which holds the ctid of a DATA continuation tuple. If
Oh no. Fortunately we need not in this: we can just add new flag
to t_infomask and add continuation tid at the end of tuple chunk.
Ok?
> a tuple doesn't fit into one block, this will tell where to
> get the next chunk of tuple data building a chain until an
> invalid ctid is found. The continuation tuples can have a
> negative t_natts to be easily identified and ignored by
> scanning routines.
...
>
> I'm not sure how to handle this with vacuum, but I believe
> Vadim is able to put some well placed goto's that make it.
-:)))
Ok, ok - I have great number of goto-s in my pocket -:)
Vadim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-07-08 11:45:47 | Re: [HACKERS] Delaying insertion of default values |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-07-08 11:06:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Delaying insertion of default values |