Re: [GENERAL] Stuck in a vacuum.

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Stuart Rison <stuart(at)ludwig(dot)ucl(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Stuck in a vacuum.
Date: 1999-07-06 03:08:30
Message-ID: 3781732E.470B87B0@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Stuart Rison wrote:
>
> Since I thought that probably left the table a bit messed up, I started a:
>
> VACUUM blast_hits;
>
> It's using 95% of the cpu and seems to be going nowhere (at least not in
> the 30 minutes it has been running so far).
>
> QUESTION 2: What do I do now? Is there any way I can kill the VACUUM or
> will they be the final nail in the table's coffin?

VACUUM uses transactions so there shouldn't be problems with
its stopping.
After that try to drop all indices over blash_hits and re-vacuum
(in verbose mode).

BTW, PG version?

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Yury 1999-07-06 03:20:01 Inheritance of primary key
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-07-06 03:04:37 Re: [GENERAL] Auto-timeout on all queries