Re: BUG #18563: Where is tha "FIRST" aggregate function??

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
Cc: iuritomazini(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18563: Where is tha "FIRST" aggregate function??
Date: 2024-08-01 19:23:29
Message-ID: 3781617.1722540209@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> writes:
>> On Aug 1, 2024, at 09:25, PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> I am migrating for
>> other database, bacause of the dificulty to get a similar resource to
>> substitute the "FIRST" in PostgreSQL and I hope you can recognize this bad
>> error and implement something to suppply this lack. Good bye!

> It's trivial to implement in PostgreSQL:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/First/last_(aggregate)

The built-in (since v16) "any_value()" aggregate is actually just like
what that page shows for "first()". The name is chosen to reflect the
fact that the aggregate itself isn't promising anything: you have to
use it in the correct way to get useful behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-08-01 19:34:55 Re: BUG #18564: Incorrect sorting with using NULLS LAST (NULLS FIRST)
Previous Message Weatherby,Gerard 2024-08-01 17:55:23 PL/python event_trigger