Re: [HACKERS] Re: First 6.5 RPMs

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Johnson <jbj(at)redhat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: First 6.5 RPMs
Date: 1999-07-02 18:34:13
Message-ID: 377D0625.5E737287@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> I'm interested in how the other interface packages installed. Perhaps
> you can install the tcl package and fire up pgaccess (should be
> trivial)?

I did -- and now I'm going to make pgaccess and the tcl client part of
my standard toolkit! I hadn't had time before to try out pgaccess --
but, it seems to work fine, once I remembered to set "-i" on the
postmaster line. BTW, while we're on that subject, might I suggest
that, since the default pg_hba.conf is for localhost only access, even
over tcp/ip, the "-i" is made the default in the postgresql init
script?? It seems that several programs need it -- pgaccess included.

> Can you try installing the rpms on your RH6.0 box before you build and
> install them yourself? I'm interested in whether they behave (I think
> they should...).

Hmmm... I'll try that first -- the problem is going to be rpms built
against glibc 2.0.7 (RH52) running against glibc 2.1 (RH6) I'll blow in
the binaries first -- if there are oddities, I'll build fresh glibc2.1
rpms and see what comes out. I will note that I have the compat-libs
installed.

> Also, before we post too many variants, perhaps we can work out the
> portability issues with perl and python; then we can probably rely on
> a single solid build on a fresh machine like your RH6.0 box.

Those two are going to be fun. I'll let you know the results of my
RedHat 6 test at home.

Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikhail Terekhov 1999-07-02 18:43:28 VACUUM ANALYZE and tuple size
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-07-02 18:01:28 Re: sgml tool