Re: [HACKERS] Severe SUBSELECT bug in 6.5 CVS

From: Chris Bitmead <cbitmead(at)ozemail(dot)com(dot)au>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Severe SUBSELECT bug in 6.5 CVS
Date: 1999-06-28 23:51:40
Message-ID: 37780A8C.38C5176B@ozemail.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Informix-SE
> > Oracle8
> >
> > and both of them return 0 rows, like PostgreSQL.
> >
>
> Yes, this is how I remembered Informix doing it.
> Returning a NULL in
> the subselect does not match anything, so hopefully we
> don't have a bug.

What is the general policy? Follow the SQL standard, or do what all the
other databases do?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-06-29 01:36:11 Re: [HACKERS] Perl library (was Building Postgres)
Previous Message Edmund Mergl 1999-06-28 19:21:33 Re: [HACKERS] Perl library (was Building Postgres)