Re: postgres has no spinlock support on riscv rv64imafdc

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Henry <rrh(dot)henry(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres has no spinlock support on riscv rv64imafdc
Date: 2021-04-15 14:04:02
Message-ID: 3777924.1618495442@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As a data point: the obvious change builds and passes basic testing
> with flying colours, on FreeBSD + clang 11 running under qemu. RISC-V
> has been "non-experimental" since clang 9. FWIW I've signed up to the
> preorder list to try to get my hands on some BeagleV hardware to test
> this stuff for real ASAP...

Yeah, I'm on that list too ... crickets so far.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2021-04-15 16:05:03 BUG #16965: Select query fails with ERROR: XX000: could not find pathkey item to sort
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2021-04-15 10:16:41 BUG #16964: Quadratic performance degradation of INSERT and ADD CONSTRAINT for intarray/GIST EXCLUDE CONSTRAINT