| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Move a comment |
| Date: | 2022-07-09 15:14:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3775998.1657379665@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> Move a comment from the to-be-deleted section of nodes.h to where it
> might still be useful.
Hm. I'm kind of sad that we lost
- /*
- * TAGS FOR RANDOM OTHER STUFF
- *
- * These are objects that aren't part of parse/plan/execute node tree
- * structures, but we give them NodeTags anyway for identification
- * purposes (usually because they are involved in APIs where we want to
- * pass multiple object types through the same pointer).
- */
Not quite sure where that info should be put now. Maybe nodes/README
could get another para that explains what types of objects get
treated as Nodes?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-09 17:36:33 | pgsql: Mark PlanState as an abstract node type. |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-07-09 13:13:18 | pgsql: Remove code sections obsoleted by node support automation |