Re: slightly off-topic: Central Auth

From: "Scot Kreienkamp" <SKreien(at)la-z-boy(dot)com>
To: <ray(at)teladesign(dot)ie>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: slightly off-topic: Central Auth
Date: 2009-10-16 19:43:45
Message-ID: 37752EAC00ED92488874A27A4554C2F303CA019A@lzbs6301.na.lzb.hq
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On 16/10/2009 19:38, Scot Kreienkamp wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
>
>
> I apologize in advance for going slightly off topic, but I have never
> setup a centralized authentication scheme under Linux. My question
is,
> what do most people do for centralized command line, X, and PG
> authentication? From what I've read the main choices are NIS or LDAP.
> LDAP would be problematic as I would have to embed a login and plain
> text password in the ldap.conf file for binding to the MS AD. On the
> other hand, it seems like NIS is old, inflexible, outdated, and
possibly
> nearing end of life. We are a largely Windows shop with many app and
> database servers running Linux. The Linux environment is growing too
> large not to do centralized authentication of some kind.
>
>
>
> At this point I'm open to suggestions or comments. SSH and X are
> required, PG would be nice to be able to auth centrally as well while
> I'm at it.

Does "PG" = PostgreSQL? If so, it can do LDAP, Kerberos and PAM, among
other things:

[Scot Kreienkamp]
But of course. :)

So I guess what I see taking shape is setting up everything to auth
against PAM locally, then setting up local PAM to auth to a remote
source.

Thanks,

Scot Kreienkamp
skreien(at)la-z-boy(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christophe Pettus 2009-10-16 19:51:20 Re: contrib/plantuner - enable PostgreSQL planner hints
Previous Message Raymond O'Donnell 2009-10-16 19:38:49 Re: slightly off-topic: Central Auth