From: | Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Severe SUBSELECT bug in 6.5 CVS |
Date: | 1999-06-25 14:58:20 |
Message-ID: | 3773990C.B58264C1@bigfoot.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports pgsql-sql |
Using the very latest CVS I'm encountering a bug in SUBSELECTs.
This query returns 22 rows...
SELECT id,title FROM question;
This query returns 15 rows...
SELECT id,title FROM question WHERE question.id IN (SELECT webobject
FROM comment);
Therefore I would expect this query to return 7 rows. Instead it returns
none....
SELECT id,title FROM question WHERE question.id NOT IN (SELECT webobject
FROM comment);
I've tried it with a newly dumped and created database and it still
happens. However I can't get it to happen on a new and empty database
with simple data. In other words I can't come up with a simple test
case. All I can think to do therefore is put my data in a file for
download. It is 100k.
ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/datadump.gz
As an aside, while creating this dump I tried to load it into another
database and drop a few tables to make it smaller. I then tried to dump
it again and got the following error...
dumpRules(): SELECT failed for table productv. Explanation from
backend: 'ERROR: cache lookup of attribute 1 in relation 1864370 failed
--
Chris Bitmead
mailto:chris(at)tech(dot)com(dot)au
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-25 15:37:03 | Re: AW: [HACKERS] fsynch of pg_log write.. |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 | 1999-06-25 14:10:19 | AW: [HACKERS] fsynch of pg_log write.. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Unprivileged user | 1999-06-25 15:24:11 | Port Bug Report: JDBC dosn't work correctly under IBM's JDK 1.1.7 |
Previous Message | Unprivileged user | 1999-06-25 13:14:01 | Port Bug Report: triggers are not loading 'c' functions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Rowan | 1999-06-25 20:48:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: trouble creating log table with rules |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-06-25 12:09:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: trouble creating log table with rules |