From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | kyzevan23(at)mail(dot)ru, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17561: Server crashes on executing row() with very long argument list |
Date: | 2022-07-29 14:40:55 |
Message-ID: | 3768321.1659105655@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote:
> I think the parser should've prevented this. It's in charge of
> rejecting overlength SELECT lists, for example. Also, the limit
> probably needs to be just MaxTupleAttributeNumber.
Concretely, about as attached.
In the existing code, if you just supply 10000 or so columns you
reach this error in heaptuple.c:
if (numberOfAttributes > MaxTupleAttributeNumber)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_TOO_MANY_COLUMNS),
errmsg("number of columns (%d) exceeds limit (%d)",
numberOfAttributes, MaxTupleAttributeNumber)));
I borrowed the errcode from that, but the wording from parse_node.c:
if (pstate->p_next_resno - 1 > MaxTupleAttributeNumber)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
errmsg("target lists can have at most %d entries",
MaxTupleAttributeNumber)));
I'm a bit inclined to adjust parse_node.c to also use TOO_MANY_COLUMNS
(54011) instead of the generic PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED (54000).
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
prevent-too-many-cols-in-ROW-expr.patch | text/x-diff | 837 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2022-07-29 15:47:00 | Re: BUG #17561: Server crashes on executing row() with very long argument list |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-29 13:55:53 | Re: BUG #17561: Server crashes on executing row() with very long argument list |