| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Craig Orsinger <orsingerc(at)epg-gw1(dot)lewis(dot)army(dot)mil>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation |
| Date: | 1999-06-16 14:18:13 |
| Message-ID: | 3767B225.DA868563@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
> > I don't know if this makes you wrong, but Informix supports
> > an INTO clause in a cursor declaration. It's one of the things I had to
> > change while porting some applications from Informix ESQL/C to ECPG.
> > Here's what Informix says about the INTO clause in their training
> > materials for ESQL/C:
> So you think we should add this? I have no idea at the moment if it causes
> problems with the parser but I will add this to my todo list.
I'd suggest *not* adding this non-SQL92 feature. afaik it adds no
functionality, so why bother messing with it? btw, OpenIngres1.1 did
not have this syntax either.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Georg Ritter | 1999-06-16 18:32:18 | IE5 & jdbc |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 1999-06-16 13:37:40 | Re: [INTERFACES] esql\c documentation |