Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 items

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, "'kar(at)webline(dot)dk'" <kar(at)webline(dot)dk>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 items
Date: 1999-06-08 14:11:49
Message-ID: 375D24A5.251438D@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Don Baccus wrote:
>
> At 03:44 PM 6/8/99 +0800, Vadim Mikheev wrote:
> >ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 wrote:
>
> >> If Vadim made the change to make pg_dump dump in one transaction then
> >> PostgreSQL already has "hot backup" in 6.5. This will do a consistent
> >> snapshot of your database as it was when pg_dump began as long as you
> >> don't change the database layout during the dump.
>
> >This is done.
>
> You boys need to publicize this. This lacking has been one of the
> biggest arguments against using Postgres in any environment with
> 24-hr access, one example being the web...

We discussed this issue recently and decided to follow this way,
so I didn't post message when pg_dump was changed, assuming
that it's known by all -:)

Or you talk that this should be mentioned in announcement/release
notes? May be... Though this is obvious feature of MVCC -
consistency read without blocking writers.

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 1999-06-08 14:19:13 Re: [HACKERS] I don't like LIKE
Previous Message Don Baccus 1999-06-08 13:56:57 Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 items