| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniele Orlandi <daniele(at)orlandi(dot)com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in LIKE ? |
| Date: | 1999-06-07 14:47:51 |
| Message-ID: | 375BDB97.2E0ABECE@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Uhm.... I think the problem is a little worse:
> > It's a real bug, and I see the problem: someone changed
> > the handling of LIKE prefixes in gram.y,
> > Unless we fix this, LIKE will be completely busted for
> > any string containing non-leading %. Shall I ... ?
> Yes, please. It was me that introduced the bug.
How about adding some regression test queries to catch this kind of
thing? Looks like we don't have *anything* in this area at all except
for tests in the multi-byte string handling, from Tatsuo.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-06-07 14:49:09 | Re: [HACKERS] LO Problem List (Can we get one) |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-06-07 14:43:49 | new one |