Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Date: 1999-06-06 12:22:44
Message-ID: 375A6814.9A9BDA23@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > In short, if you load a bunch of tuples into a table, the first select
> > after the load can run a lot slower than you might expect, because it'll
> > be writing back most or all of the pages it touches. But that penalty
> > doesn't affect every select, only the first one to scan a newly-written
> > tuple.
>
> I have removed this from the TODO list:
>
> * Prevent fsync in SELECT-only queries

When selecting (i.e. - read-only) transaction commits,
it change pg_log - we obviously can avoid this!
No sense to store commit/abort status of read-only xactions!

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-06-06 12:25:52 Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-06-06 12:20:23 Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6