From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gould <andrewgould(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | "J(dot)H(dot)M(dot) Dassen \(Ray\)" <jdassen(at)cistron(dot)nl>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: template0 and template1 databases |
Date: | 2001-09-06 19:42:28 |
Message-ID: | 3759.999805348@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Andrew Gould <andrewgould(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Okay, so I don't need to pg_dump the template*
> databases; and I should not dropdb them.
template0 shouldn't need to be dumped, since it's always supposed to be
virgin initdb data. template1 may need to be dumped if you have any
site-local additions in it. pg_dumpall gets these considerations right.
As for dropping, the system won't let you do it unless you go in and
hand-hack pg_database's datistemplate flags. I have actually tested
dropping template1 and recreating it from template0, which I suppose
someone might want to do if they mess up template1 badly enough.
If you drop template0, you no longer have a guaranteed virgin database
to use as a reference, but perhaps that doesn't bother you.
> My scripts aren't anything to brag about; but I think
> newbies (such as myself) may find them useful. Who
> reviews contributions for /contrib?
Send 'em to pgsql-patches, I guess.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Harding | 2001-09-06 19:56:58 | SQL Server to PostgreSQL HOWTO |
Previous Message | Andrew Gould | 2001-09-06 19:35:31 | Re: template0 and template1 databases |