Re: [GENERAL] Parallelizing PostgreSQL for Cluster

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Parallelizing PostgreSQL for Cluster
Date: 1999-06-04 00:16:24
Message-ID: 37571AD8.459C1B73@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> # One of the long-term projects that PostgreSQL, Inc is planning on
> # working on is exactly this, unless someone jumps at it before we get a
> # chance to...
>
> It should be a trivial change, right? :)

Will it make it into 6.5?

:)
>
> # On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Laurence Liew wrote:
> #
> # > Hi!
> # >
> # > Is anyone looking at making postgreSQL scalable across a cluster of PCs?
> # > That is, we have postgreSQL exuting queries which can be parallelised across
> # > a cluster, either something along Informix's method of fragmenting the
> # > tables across multiple disks, or Oracle's method of using a shared disk
> # > (global file)architecture.
> # >
> # > It would be interesting to have PostrgreSQL sitting on a Beowulf cluster
> # > giving Informix XPS or Oracle OPS a run for their money :-)
> # >
> # > Thanks for any info.
> # >
> # > Laurence
> # >
> # >
> # >
> # >
> #
> # Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> # Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> # primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
> #
> #
> #
>
> --
> SA, beyond.com My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
> pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
> | Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
> L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Lynch 1999-06-04 02:32:39 Weird: attribute 'input' not found
Previous Message patrickdlogan 1999-06-03 22:59:11 Re: [GENERAL] Implementing hierarchy