Re: Postgresql Split Brain: Which one is latest

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql Split Brain: Which one is latest
Date: 2018-04-10 16:52:50
Message-ID: 374d1972-342d-2ccb-8a48-db4a1272587b@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

You need to find out when the split happened, and whether each new master
have records since then.

On 04/10/2018 11:47 AM, Vikas Sharma wrote:
> Thanks Adrian and Edison, I also think so. At the moment I have 2 masters,
> as soon as slave is promoted to master it starts its own timeline and
> application might have added data to either of them or both, only way to
> find out correct master now is the instance with max count of data in
> tables which could incur data loss as well. Correct me if wrong please?
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Vikas
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018, 17:29 Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2018 08:04 AM, Vikas Sharma wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > This can be a good example: Application server e.g. tomcat having two
> > entries to connect to databases, one for master and 2nd for Slave
> > (ideally used when slave becomes master). If application is not able to
> > connect to first, it will try to connect to 2nd.
>
> So the application server had a way of seeing the new master(old slave),
> in spite of the network glitch, that the original master database did not?
>
> If so and it was distributing data between the two masters on an unknown
> schedule, then as Edison pointed out in another post, you really have a
> split brain issue. Each master would have it's own view of the data and
> latest update would really only be relevant for that master.
>
> >
> > Regards
> > Vikas
> >
> > On 10 April 2018 at 15:26, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
> > <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 04/10/2018 06:50 AM, Vikas Sharma wrote:
> >
> >         Hi,
> >
> >         We have postgresql 9.5 with streaming replication(Master-slave)
> >         and automatic failover. Due to network glitch we are in
> >         master-master situation for quite some time. Please, could you
> >         advise best way to confirm which node is latest in terms of
> >         updates to the postgres databases.
> >
> >
> >     It might help to know how the two masters received data when they
> >     where operating independently.
> >
> >
> >         Regards
> >         Vikas Sharma
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Adrian Klaver
> > adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
> <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com <mailto:adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
>

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2018-04-10 16:55:17 Re: Postgresql Split Brain: Which one is latest
Previous Message Vikas Sharma 2018-04-10 16:47:56 Re: Postgresql Split Brain: Which one is latest