Stupid SQl question on inserting items

From: "Zot O'Connor" <zot(at)ZotConsulting(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Stupid SQl question on inserting items
Date: 1999-05-25 17:31:58
Message-ID: 374ADE8E.E7895F5@ZotConsulting.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

This is a dumb basic level SQL question.

is there any other way to insert records without having to fill in all
of the values as in

INSERT into table_name WITH VALUES (blah, blah, blah...)

or the COPY method?

It is becoming a chore to sync up a table with a lot of fields. I am
porting several DB into postgres and using a variety of techniques to do
it (some of these are poorly formatted text files). Most of the fields
are blank, so when I goof up, I spend 15 minutes comparing files to find
the problem. The elusive "parse error near '" does not help much :)

I thought I knew how to do this with Postgres but can't seem to find it
in my notes.

I thought something along the lines of insert a blank (except for id)
record than updating it with name pairs might work.

--
Zot O'Connor

www.ZotConsulting.com
www.WhiteKnightHackers.com

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 1999-05-25 17:33:28 Re: [SQL] Stupid SQl question on inserting items
Previous Message Gregory W Burnham 1999-05-25 17:28:23 Re: [SQL] Stupid SQl question on inserting items