Re: table inheritance partition and indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: table inheritance partition and indexes
Date: 2022-11-23 22:01:47
Message-ID: 3748575.1669240907@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 1:24 PM Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Out of curiosity, why INHERITS in v13 instead of PARTITION BY?

> Because none of the declarative partition types do what I want.

Then you're stuck managing it manually. But ATTACH PARTITION is
not relevant to INHERITS-style partitioning.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ted Toth 2022-11-23 22:34:02 Re: table inheritance partition and indexes
Previous Message Ted Toth 2022-11-23 21:49:26 Re: table inheritance partition and indexes