Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dan McGee <dan(at)archlinux(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant
Date: 2011-10-24 17:17:26
Message-ID: 3747.1319476646@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> [ oom_score_adj business ]

> Did we do anything about this? Anyone else have an opinion on what
> ought to be done?

I held off doing anything because it didn't seem like we had consensus.
OTOH, it may well be that it's not important enough to demand real
consensus, and he who does the work gets to make the choices.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Urbański 2011-10-24 17:18:04 Re: Monster query
Previous Message Omar Bettin 2011-10-24 17:16:28 Monster query