From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | bernaridho(at)outlook(dot)co(dot)id, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17111: Database created, cannot be created, but reported as inexist |
Date: | 2021-07-16 17:56:23 |
Message-ID: | 3745704.1626458183@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> writes:
> Can we remove the code for compatibility with 7.2 or older?
I'm kind of inclined not to, because most other ways that you can
specify a database name for a connection also don't downcase.
$ psql Postgres
psql: error: connection to server on socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5440" failed: FATAL: database "Postgres" does not exist
$ psql postgres
...
postgres=# \c "dbname=Postgres"
connection to server on socket "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.5440" failed: FATAL: database "Postgres" does not exist
Previous connection kept
This largely stems from an ancient decision that we shouldn't
auto-downcase names coming from a program's command line.
The interaction of SQL and shell quoting conventions is messy
enough that specifying a non-lower-case database, user, etc name
would be pretty annoying if we did do that.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2021-07-16 18:02:18 | Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2021-07-16 16:40:34 | Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types |