| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Broken select on regular expression !!! |
| Date: | 1999-05-21 13:09:20 |
| Message-ID: | 37455B00.837F75EB@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I vaguely recall that we used to support only "basic" regex. At least
> I thought so. Now looking into the source, I found we have supported
> "extended" regex. FYI, our regex routines definitely supprt '{'. See
> backend/regex/re_format.7.
Didn't even know that man page existed. It sure would be nice to have
it in the main docs, perhaps in the chapter on operators...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1999-05-21 13:29:04 | [HACKERS] 6.5 cvs: views doesn't survives after pg_dump (fwd) |
| Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1999-05-21 13:06:57 | Empty system tables |