Tom Lane wrote:
>
> David Sauer <davids(at)orfinet(dot)cz> writes:
> > => lock table t row share mode;
> > LOCK TABLE
> > ... this works
> > but:
> > => lock table t IN row share mode;
> > ERROR: parser: parse error at or near "in"
> > .... but this not
>
> > It is mistake in grammar, or is there all OK ?
>
> I see this behavior too, and a quick look at gram.y shows that indeed
> it is not expecting IN in a LOCK statement. I do not know whether the
> standard permits (or requires?) the IN keyword, so I don't know whether
> to make the change...
IN is required...
Vadim