From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Thomas Swan" <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jeff Boes" <jboes(at)nexcerpt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, matthew(at)zeut(dot)net |
Subject: | Re: pg_autovacuum crashes when query fails for temp |
Date: | 2004-04-20 18:19:09 |
Message-ID: | 37398.192.154.91.225.1082485149.squirrel@192.154.91.225 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Should pg_autovacuum be vacuuming temporary tables?
This is a good question, and I would like some opinions from some other
people more informed than I.
> Secondly, why would
> a temporary table for another session be visible to pg_autovacuum? I
> know these may sound like stupid questions, but I'm a little shocked
> that it found a temp table. Did someone make a permanent table, delete
> it, and pg_autovacuum found it in between those operations?
I will look into this when I have time, it certainly would be possible
that pg_autovacuum could be tripped up by a sequence of events like you
describe above. The more general problem is that it shouldn't crash even
if it's vacuuming tables it shouldn't.
Matthew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | AlmawElias Fantahun | 2004-04-20 20:06:16 | unsubscribe |
Previous Message | Thomas Swan | 2004-04-20 17:29:20 | Re: pg_autovacuum crashes when query fails for temp tables |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Browne | 2004-04-20 19:19:04 | Re: pl/j looking for alpha testers |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-04-20 17:37:58 | Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore |