From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pedro Gimeno <pgsql-004(at)personal(dot)formauri(dot)es>, rschaaf(at)commoninf(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: BUG #12885: The result of casting a double to an integer depends on the database version |
Date: | 2015-03-25 14:37:38 |
Message-ID: | 3736.1427294258@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Pedro Gimeno
> <pgsql-004(at)personal(dot)formauri(dot)es> wrote:
>> The only point of using copysign there was to deal with a negative zero
>> corner case. The attached removes copysign from the test program too,
>> relying instead on sprintf outputting the sign of minus zero when available.
> Cool, thanks. Applied to the code tree of Postgres, it gives the patch attached.
This is pretty desperately in need of some comments, but I'll see what
I can do with it.
I assume the consensus is that we should not back-patch this? It seems
like the kind of behavioral change that people might get annoyed about.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sékine Coulibaly | 2015-03-25 15:06:17 | Re: "no-slave yet" early CREATE TABLE transaction gets blocked when synchronous replication |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2015-03-25 14:31:47 | Re: "no-slave yet" early CREATE TABLE transaction gets blocked when synchronous replication |