| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we still have old release notes in docs? |
| Date: | 2019-02-12 16:12:20 |
| Message-ID: | 3732.1549987940@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2019-02-12 11:00:51 -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
>> I love having the old release notes online but perhaps they can be
>> somewhere other than the main docs? We could limit the current docs to
>> including the release notes for just the supported versions -- after
>> all you can always get the old release notes in the old docs
>> themselves.
> You're behind the times, that just happened (in a pretty uncoordinated
> manner).
Yeah, see 527b5ed1a et al.
The part about having a unified release-note archive somewhere else is
still WIP. The ball is in the web team's court on that, I think.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2019-02-12 16:21:33 | Re: use Getopt::Long for catalog scripts |
| Previous Message | Arseny Sher | 2019-02-12 16:10:55 | Re: Too rigorous assert in reorderbuffer.c |