Re: [HACKERS] XIDTAG ???

Massimo Dal Zotto ha scritto:

> >
> > > On Mon, 3 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > Probably no reason for the transaction id. I don't remember that being
> > > > used at all.
> > >
> > > Do you mean that there is no reason for the xid to exist, as it is not
> > > used? If so, then may I humbly request that it be left in for another

If I understand you are talking about to take off the xid type, if so,
I want warn you that xmin is an xid type and we are using it as
a versioning-row on psqlodbc.

> > > six months in the hopes of using a transaction processing monitor to
> > > distribute postgres across multiple machines safely? I'll need the xid
> > > if and when I start that project, which will be after I finish the
> > > TPM. 8^)
> >
> > No, I don't recommend removing it, but just not storing it in the lock
> > system. There is no need for it there.
>
> I don't see any urgent reason for removing it. For the moment I would leave
> the code as is. A distributed postgres sounds interesting.
>
> --
> Massimo Dal Zotto
>
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Massimo Dal Zotto email: dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it |
> | Via Marconi, 141 phone: ++39-0461534251 |
> | 38057 Pergine Valsugana (TN) www: http://www.cs.unitn.it/~dz/ |
> | Italy pgp: finger dz(at)tango(dot)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+

> ______________________________________________________________

PostgreSQL 6.5.0 on i586-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc 2.7.2.3
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jose'